关于我们 捐赠支持 版权声明
         
时事评论| 公民社会| 零八宪章| 人权关注| 民主法治| 观点争鸣| 中国经济| 历史回顾| 国际观察| 民族问题|
人文关怀| 民生百态| 社会观察| 国际经济| 台湾社会| 香港社会| 宗教自由| 法律法制| 变革之路| 生态环境|
网站总流量:10739588 文章总阅读量:2967357
返回上一页  
赞美者: 反对者: 点阅者: 评论:

“川習會”前夕,楊建利在《國家評論》發表文章籲川普解除“一中”魔咒
(4/5/2017 7:22:30 AM )

何佳


“川習會”前夕,楊建利在《國家評論》發表文章籲川普解除“一中”魔咒

 

《公民議報》 記者 何佳

 

201745

 

今天,在川普和習近平預定的本月6-7日在佛羅里達麻阿拉溝莊園會見前夕,公民力量發起人楊建利博士在美國著名保守派雜誌《國家評論》(National Review)發表文章,敦促美國總統川普解除“一個中國”政策魔咒。

 

楊建利在文中簡述了美國一步一步被中共的“一個中國”政策魔咒的歷史,強調隨著冷戰地緣政治局面的改變、中華民國在台灣從威權到民主化到鞏固民主的轉變,隨著中共專制政權的軍事力量的提升和民族主義外交政策的需求強烈化,以台海為支點的道義和戰略天平發生了根本變化,繼續被中共“一個中國”政策困纏,從道義上和戰略上都會是極大的失誤。楊建利呼籲美國政府審視檢討“一個中國”政策,修改“台灣關係法”和對台灣的“六項保障”以反映中華民國在台灣完全民主國家的地位,承諾對民主盟友的安全保衛責任。



原文全文如下:

 

Why President Trump Should Break the 'One China' Spell

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/446434/one-china-policy-trump-should-reform-it

 

NATIONAL REVIEW

Why President Trump Should Break the 'One China' Spell

Standing up for Taiwan, a key democratic ally, will benefit American interests in the long run.

By Jianli Yang - April 5, 2017

 

During China's recent "Two sessions," in which some 5,000 governing elites gathered in Beijing to rubber-stamp the agenda of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Wang Hongguang, a retired Chinese general, publicly dared the United States to deploy a Terminal High Altitude Area Defense system (THAAD) in Taiwan. He boasted that the deployment would provide the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) with an excuse to use force to "liberate" the island.

 

Wang had earlier dared the U.S. to deploy Marines to guard the site of the American Institute in Taiwan, the de facto American Embassy on the island. He has threatened to use harsh countermeasures to retaliate against the government of Tsai Ing-wen, even though she had nothing to do with the decision to deploy the Marines in Taipei.

 

Wang's threats came at the time of a major shift in President Trump's tone and stance toward China. He has recently retreated from his strong rhetoric against the Chinese Communist regime and from his pre-inauguration position that the U.S doesn't "have to be bound" by the so-called One China policy.

 

Trump's flip-flop on the One China policy has caused unnecessary confusion in Asia. It has weakened the administration's moral position and credibility and has arguably given Beijing the upper hand in the cross-Strait relationship.

 

In my view, the One China policy is a trap that has been plied by Beijing to legitimize and strengthen the CCP dictatorship, squeeze Taiwan's international space, and force Taiwan to kneel at Beijing's feet. President Trump should take a fresh look at the One China policy, and honor the "right" China.

 

The contentious One China policy arose from the reality of two Chinas: the Republic of China (ROC) and the People's Republic of China (PRC). The United States recognized the ROC in 1913, two years after the Chinese overthrew the Manchus' Qing Dynasty, in 1911. With Stalin's support, the Chinese Communists won the civil war and founded the People's Republic of China in 1949. The ROC, led by its authoritarian ruler Chiang Kai-shek, retreated to Taiwan.

 

In the late 1960s and early '70s, President Nixon was anxious to get out of Vietnam and counter the Soviets' global expansion during the Cold War. Henry Kissinger persuaded Nixon to betray and abandon the ROC - America's long loyal ally in Asia - by recognizing the PRC government as the sole legitimate government of China. Thus America willingly accepted the One China policy. In 1979, the U.S. Congress passed the Taiwan Relations Act to maintain unofficial relations with the ROC. Later, President Reagan gave the "Six Assurances" for the ROC's security, all of which were designed to keep the cross-Strait status quo.

 

Most American experts on China argue that this policy has worked well because it has helped maintain the regional peace. But I believe that the One China policy is seriously flawed and should be reviewed and modified. This policy has helped Beijing fundamentally shift the power balance in its favor, resulting in the creation of an authoritarian behemoth that impinges on the right of the Taiwanese people to self-determination and that poses a severe threat to both regional and global peace. Beijing has demanded the recognition of One China as a prerequisite for entering into diplomatic relations and joining international organizations, and it has successfully excluded Taiwan from the current international system.

 

This is unfair to the people of Taiwan. The ROC has always been an outstanding member of the international community. It made enormous sacrifices during World War II and great contributions to the Asian economic take-off. Even in the wake of America's abandonment of Taiwan and Beijing's relentless pressure, the ROC has peacefully transformed itself into a democratic country and become a beacon of freedom in Asia.

 

By contrast, since the Communist regime in Beijing first entered the international community under the One China policy, it has taken advantage of American markets, capital, and technology to rise to its position as an evil empire. Instead of respecting international law and order, as Kissinger assured it would, Beijing has sought to reshape the international order in ways that ensure the PRC's dominance. The CCP brutally cracks down on any dissent by its citizens and also undermines international peace and stability by bullying countries in the region, including Taiwan. Worse, the regime even boasts about its capability to nuke America.

 

Standing up for democracy has long been a core element of American foreign policy, not only because the U.S. has a moral obligation to support democratic countries who share the same values but also because such support will make America and the world more secure.

 

The One China policy forced on Washington by Beijing has not been adjusted to take into account the ROC's democratic governance. At the same time, an underlying assumption of the policy, namely, political reform and peaceful transition, has not materialized. In short, the policy is out of date and not in the long-term best interest of the U.S., and it should be updated accordingly.

 

America's difficulty in refining the ambiguous One China policy has over time allowed Beijing to hijack and distort the term. For example, the U.S. only acknowledged Beijing's One China position in the 1972 first joint communiqué of the PRC and the U.S., without expressly accepting it. But in the 1979 joint communiqué of the PRC and the U.S., the U.S. recognized Beijing as the sole legitimate government of China, and further, in these nations' third joint communiqué, in 1982, the U.S. was pushed to admit that it had no intention of pursuing a policy of "two Chinas" or "one China, one Taiwan." President Clinton went to so far as to state that the U.S. would not support Taiwan's independence. Presidents Bush and Obama also took a similar position. Today, the PRC and America have, in practice, recognized of the One China policy as legitimate. Step by step, Beijing has fully cast its One China spell on the U.S.

 

The grave danger caused by the United States' ambiguous, often self-contradictory statements and practice regarding One China is that they fail to draw a red line to guarantee Taiwan's security in a legally binding agreement; this could offer an opportunity for Beijing to invade the island in the future. The U.S. did not secure Beijing's commitment to abandon the use of force against Taiwan. In 2005, the Communist regime passed the so-called anti-secession law, explicitly stipulating that it will use force against Taiwan's "independence provocation." But that term's meaning remains totally subject to the regime's interpretation. Today, more than a thousand missiles are pointing at the island across the Taiwan Strait, but Beijing considers it a serious "provocation" if the ROC even mentions THAAD as a possible means of defending itself from a potential attack.

 

Even if the One China policy was justified 40 years ago, the geopolitical conditions calling for it no longer exist: The Soviet Union collapsed long ago, and the new Moscow has formed a strategic alliance with Beijing; Vietnam now sides with the U.S. in opposing China's aggressive behavior in the South China Sea, and the PRC has become a formidable power challenging the America's global leadership.

 

I believe the best way to break the One China spell is for the U.S. to refuse to accept Beijing's sovereignty over Taiwan and to formally recognize the ROC as a legitimate government by signing an agreement with it. The agreement should incorporate the updated and expanded components in the Taiwan Relations Act and President Reagan's "Six Assurances" to reflect Taiwan's democracy and America's commitment to its defense. Such strategic and moral clarity will deter Beijing's aggression and achieve peace through strength in the region.

 

To conclude, I want to quote a fellow citizen of China: "As a mainland shitzen (sh** + citizen), I do not give a sh** who is in power, but I am happy to see Taiwan not be swallowed by the CCP, because it is far better to let some people live free than have us all suffer under slavery."

 

I hope President Trump has this Chinese shitzen's political wisdom to break the One China spell, which would help him make America greater.

 

- Jianli Yang is the founder and president of Initiatives for China / Citizen Power for China and a former political prisoner of the Chinese government.



《公民议报》首发,转载请注明:文章来自公民议报
 
请发表评论! 赞成 反对
评论者* 联系方式:
评论*
点阅者评论[以下评论不代表本报立场!]
友情链接
独立中文笔会 新唐人电视台 新世纪 纵览中国 Email: yibaochina@gmail.com
北京之春 大纪元 自由信息网 观察  
开放 新世纪 中国转型智库 南方周末  
民主中国 维权网 炎黄春秋 南方都市报
凯迪网络 博讯 天涯社区 中國婦權